The validation platform
In developmentAI made building easy. It did not make it ready.
Agents run your application, try to break it the way a real user would, and hand you a readiness report that tells you what to fix before launch.
Code now moves faster than anyone's ability to judge it
Your team ships in a day what used to take a week. The question hasn't changed: is this ready for a user?
Manual testing can't keep that pace, and code review reads what was written, not what happens when it runs. So things reach production that nobody actually tried.
How it works
- 01
You give us a link
An application or an agent, on a working public URL.
- 02
The agents go to work
They browse, fill in forms, try the paths nobody planned for, and attempt to break it.
- 03
You get a readiness report
What broke, how to reproduce it, and how serious it is, in Arabic and English.
The first version tests public URLs.
What the agents check
Core paths
Does it do what you promised? Sign-up, input, saving, sign-out.
Break attempts
Unexpected input, load, and steps taken out of order.
Visible security
What leaks in the interface, in messages, or in headers.
Agent readiness
For agents specifically: does it hold its boundaries, and what does it do with a hostile input or an out-of-scope question?
Your link, and whatever we find in it, belong to you alone.
Read security and privacyJoin the waitlist
We're opening gradually. Leave your email and tell us what you're building; we start with the projects closest to what we're preparing first.
